How The Oligarchs Plan To Steal The Election By Paul Craig Roberts “Information Clearing House” – I am now convinced that the Oligarchy that rules America intends to steal the presidential election. In the past, the oligarchs have not cared which candidate won as the oligarchs owned both. But they do not own Trump. Most […]
Of all the internal problems the Presidential candidates could solve – Clinton harps on about “Russian aggression.” Going into Russophobic overdrive in recent days – it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see whose side the zio-media are on.
In 2007, Putin informed the Western world that Russia will develop a secret weapon to counter US advances. This was said in response to the US missile defense system that was being developed at the time (previously prohibited in international law.) Russia’s counter-measure weapon is now almost complete. With the NATO missile defense system on Russia’s doorstep – the threat to international security is very real; not that you would know it via mainstream Murdoch media.
In 2002, the United States unilaterally and without consultation, withdrew from the landmark Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty. President George W. Bush noted that the treaty is “now behind us,” describing the ABM Treaty as a Cold War relic.
Signed in 1972, the ABM Treaty barred both the US and the USSR from deploying national defenses against long-range ballistic missiles. The treaty was based on the premise that if either superpower constructed a strategic defense, the other would build up its offensive nuclear forces to offset the defense.
The superpowers would therefore quickly be put on a path toward a never-ending offensive-defensive arms race, as each tried to balance its counterpart’s actions. Until Bush took office, the Treaty was referred to as a “cornerstone of strategic stability” because it facilitated later agreements, reducing U.S. and Russian strategic nuclear arsenals.
The US, assuming that a weakened Russia will never again be in a position to counter US hegemonic power, proceeded to encroach on Russia’s borders through its manipulation of NATO objectives.
Today, there is no instrument in international law that prevents the possibility of mutually assured destruction. Putin has been sending out warnings for over 10 years – all of which fell on deaf ears. Who will push the button first?
Please do your part and share this video!
Join me on: https://www.patreon.com/inessaS
What a terrible structural -,moral -, and political dilemma for all those involved !!
How can this country represent and promote freedom and peace !!!
Below videos “just” as illustration:
Mindy McGillivray is claiming that Republican presidential nominee Donald J. Trump “nudged” and “grabbed” her at a Ray Charles concert at Mar-A-Lago on January 24, 2003. As she told local media, Trump was allegedly forceful:
McGillivray, who was 23 at the time, said it was one of five or six times she helped Davidoff on photo shoots at Mar-a-Lago.
“Ken says, ‘We’re going to get backstage. Ray Charles is going to be there.’ He was one of my idols,’’ she recalled. “Ken wanted to get a picture of me and Ray, but that didn’t happen because he had all these bodyguards.’’
After the show, Davidoff and McGillivray were standing in a pavilion behind the main house in the middle of a group of people. To their left was Regis Philbin and his wife, Joy, according to Davidoff. To McGillivray’s immediate right was Trump and his fiancée, Melania.
“Ray already performed. He’s ready to leave. He’s saying his goodbyes to everyone,’’ McGillivray recalled.
“All of a sudden I felt a grab, a little nudge. I think it’s Ken’s camera bag, that was my first instinct. I turn around and there’s Donald. He sort of looked away quickly. I quickly turned back, facing Ray Charles, and I’m stunned.’’
McGillivray said she remembers saying to herself, ‘’‘OK, am I going to say something now and make a scene or be quiet?’ I chose to stay quiet.’’
Davidoff said he did not witness the alleged groping but he said he has never had any reason to doubt McGillivray.
Asked about the possibility that what she felt was Trump or someone accidentally bumping into her, McGillivray said no. “This was a pretty good nudge. More of a grab,’’ she said. “It was pretty close to the center of my butt. I was startled. I jumped.’’
A bombshell story, right?
This “little nudge”… Which has now become a full-blown “grab” and “grope” 13 years, later raises many questions.
First McGillivrey claims she was nudged in 2003, when Trump was engaged to Melania. But Trump didn’t propose until April 2004! How did the media not check this most basic fact?
But to make matters worse, the liberal media never verified if a Ray Charles concert at Mar-A-Lago even happened on January 24, 2003.
This photo from Davidoff Photos Studio (below) was created on January 1 (3 weeks before the incident), but there are no documents showing a concert took place on that day. A Ray Charles concert was cancelled in Seattle, Washington on January 23 (the day before).
In addition, McGillivrey is going to have a serious trouble explaining her credibility in court. A quick Google search shows she’s been arrested for drunk driving with a child in the car. See here, here, and here.
Why is the media so quick to believe her, but are quick to bury the incredibly well-documented crimes and abuses of former President Bill Clinton?
This story doesn’t add up, and it’s clear the media is willing to push any story that hurts Trump before the November elections.
Please share this with your friends on Facebook and Twitter. This story doesn’t add up, and America deserves to know the truth!
NOTICE: This is a developing story, it is being actively updated as information comes available. Please check back for updates. Last Updated 4:23AM GMT (12:54 PM Eastern United States)
FINAL UPDATE: 4:24AM GMT 10/18/2016 (12:24AM EST US) New Article will collate results of this breaking news Article Here(link to be added once article completed). Wikileaks has not addressed the Court Decision ending Julian Assange’s Appeal against his Warrant in Sweden. No proof of life given since the claim of a raid on the Embassy. Only this tweet.
With WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in the news we’re seeing a lot of errors. Check the facts: https://t.co/yTgeAcAnmQ
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 17, 2016
Wikileaks claims the media has a lot of misinformation, Embassy will not confirm he is at the Embassy, Leaks were delayed throughout the day.
UPDATE 4:54PM GMT (12:54PM EST) Information circulating that suggests there are more members of @Wikileaks impacted. Not just Assange at the Embassy. Wikileaks has someone still posting regardless.
— ALWAYS TRUMP! (@Always_Trump) October 17, 2016
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 17, 2016
UPDATE 3:59PM GMT (11:59AM EST) It appears Wikileaks has signalled all operatives to take measures to protect themselves. Guccifer 2.0 has indicated he is ready for the next release. Looks like Podesta 10 is still coming, but possibly just late.
Also developing story, RT Media’s Bank Accounts Closed in the UK (Suspected close ties to Wikileaks? or Propaganda we don’t know, will start new article on that story soon.)
i’m here and ready for new releases. already changed my location
thanks @wikileaks for a good job!
— GUCCIFER 2.0 (@GUCCIFER_2) October 17, 2016
UPDATE 3:35PM GMT (11:35AM EST): Wikileaks has missed its own deadline to post next release of Podesta Emails. London Police still refuse to comment, Embassy still refuses to confirm if Julian Assange is on the property. Wikileaks Communications channels are completely silent. Wikileaks Website is still intermittent, reason unknown.
UPDATE 2:44PM GMT (10:44PM EST): Associated Press reports Embassy refuses to confirm Assange is still on the property. Local London Police refuse to comment.
From time to time Wikileaks creates what are called “Insurance Files”. These files are released into the wild using a Torrent. A Torrent is a distributed file sharing technology that allows the downloader to become the host. It is a way to get data out without sending it from a central source. It is impossible for any government to stop a Torrent without severely restricting every citizen in the effort.
Through the entire history of Wikileaks, Julian Assange has never released the keys to decrypt an Insurance file, until now. As the community wonders what Wikileaks means by its posts, information warriors have already decrypted and analyzed portions of the 88GB Insurance File. Folks! Based on our early analysis, John Kerry is likely going to prison.
About eight hours before this article was written Wikileaks released three separate keys for an Insurance File. It is believed by the community of Wikileaks insiders that this was the result of a “Dead Man Switch”. This is an action that Julian Assange must take periodically to prevent an automatic tweet which releases information. We have no information to substantiate these rumors.
This means that not only is Wikileaks releasing a portion of the 88 Gigabytes of data, they are releasing it without placing it on their website. Wikileaks called the Tweets “pre-commitments”. It is interesting that the three “pre-commitment” keys released are concerning the UK, Ecuador, and John Kerry. All of which are parties involved in Julian Assange’s current situation at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.
John Kerry has threatened the Ecuadorian President with “grave consequences for Equador” if Assange is not silenced @StoneColdTruth
— Roger Stone (@RogerJStoneJr) October 17, 2016
The following phone call was recorded two hours before the reports of a possible raid on the Embassy. The person who shared it has restricted the ability to share it here is the link.
Reddit has created a Mega Thread regarding these claims, which occurred AFTER the Julian Assange proof of life video.
No English based news agencies have reported on the most recent development related to the Swedish Arrest Warrant.
Roger Stone Tweeted a few minutes later after the above Tweet was posted.
Reports the Brits storm the Ecuadorian Embassy tonite while Kerry demands the UK revoke their diplomatic status so Assange can be seized
— Roger Stone (@RogerJStoneJr) October 17, 2016
This could be related to negotiations between those parties and the freedom on Julian Assange. Also, John Kerry recently threatened Ecuador if they did not silence Assange. It appears there is something more going on, but currently, no one is talking.
We are analyzing the keys provided in the Tweets against the Insurance Files. As we know more we will make as much information about this as we can available, without jeopardizing anyone’s safety.
Just under an hour before this article was written Wikileaks tweeted:
We are not sure if this is related to the keys for the Insurance Files or not. We will update you as soon as we know more.
Julian Assange’s internet link has been intentionally severed by a state party. We have activated the appropriate contingency plans.
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 17, 2016
Normally we would link to the Tweets, however, due to the nature of the current situation we have provided images of those Tweets.
We can only confirm that Julian Assange has only been disconnected from the Internet.
Finally, our technical experts have asked us to add a clarification. There are a lot of people claiming that these are not keys, but instead only the hash of the plain text. They clearly do not understand Encryption. A hash is used to validate the authenticity of the sender against the sender’s public key in a PKI infrastructure.
These files were not encrypted using PKI, they were encrypted using multi-key overlays, with multiple keys per file section. In other words, these Hex Keys decrypt the portion of the files that include information about the subject mentioned in the Tweets.
Youtube Video showing caller attempting to determine if Assange is still at the Embassy and if he is still alive: “I am sorry I can’t talk about that.” was the response he received.
If this website or this post disappears, without an explanation from us, you will know that we were forced to take it down by authorities.
Protests at the North Dakota Access Pipeline, fighting for clean water, have been met with absurdly repressive resistance from the police. Militarized police were sent to break up extremely peaceful protests. They arrested actress/activist Shailene Woodley and 27 other protesters. Similarly, near the environmentalist shutdown of the Tar Sands Oil pipeline, not only activists were arrested, but also award-winning documentarian Deia Schlosberg. When the local police prepare themselves with ultimate force to arrest peaceful protesters and journalists, they make journalism a dangerous crime. What could this mean for the future of political opposition in America? Lee Camp discusses this and more on Redacted Tonight.
GET FREE TICKETS to be in our LIVE AUDIENCE in Washington DC! Email RedactedTix@gmail.com.
OTHER CITIES – We tour regularly with live stand-up comedy. For a list of where we’ll be performing our stand-up comedy shows, go here – http://LeeCamp.net/schedule/
Join the ‘Redactivist’ movement online…
Subscribe to the Redacted Tonight YouTube channel for more comedy news with saber tooth tiger teeth: http://youtube.com/user/RedactedTonight
Find Redacted Tonight on Facebook for source material about our stories and daily updates:
Follow us on Twitter for funny, informative info and to participate in our weekly ‘Redactivist’ hashtag:
Visit Lee Camp’s official site to listen to the ‘Moment of Clarity: The Backstage of Redacted Tonight’ podcast w/ Lee and John F.O’Donnell:
How America’s Police Became An Army: The 1033 Program
Suzanna Arundhati Roy is an Indian author and political activist who is best known for the 1998 Man Booker Prize for Fiction winning novel The God of Small Things (1997) and for her involvement in environmental and human rights causes. Her books: https://www.amazon.com/gp/search?ie=U…
Roy’s novel became the biggest-selling book by a nonexpatriate Indian author.
In a 2001 opinion piece in the British newspaper The Guardian, Arundhati Roy responded to the US military invasion of Afghanistan, finding fault with the argument that this war would be a retaliation for the September 11 attacks: “The bombing of Afghanistan is not revenge for New York and Washington. It is yet another act of terror against the people of the world.” According to her, US President George W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair were guilty of a Big Brother kind of doublethink: “When he announced the air strikes, President George Bush said: ‘We’re a peaceful nation.’ America’s favourite ambassador, Tony Blair, (who also holds the portfolio of prime minister of the UK), echoed him: ‘We’re a peaceful people.’ So now we know. Pigs are horses. Girls are boys. War is peace.”
She disputes US claims of being a peaceful and freedom-loving nation, listing China and nineteen 3rd World “countries that America has been at war with — and bombed — since the second world war”, as well as previous US support for the Taliban movement and support for the Northern Alliance (whose “track record is not very different from the Taliban’s”). She does not spare the Taliban: “Now, as adults and rulers, the Taliban beat, stone, rape and brutalise women, they don’t seem to know what else to do with them.”
In the final analysis, Roy sees American-style capitalism as the culprit: “In America, the arms industry, the oil industry, the major media networks, and, indeed, US foreign policy, are all controlled by the same business combines.” She puts the attacks on the World Trade Center and on Afghanistan on the same moral level, that of terrorism, and mourns the impossibility of imagining beauty after 2001: “Will it be possible ever again to watch the slow, amazed blink of a newborn gecko in the sun, or whisper back to the marmot who has just whispered in your ear — without thinking of the World Trade Centre and Afghanistan?”
In May 2003 she delivered a speech entitled “Instant-Mix Imperial Democracy (Buy One, Get One Free)” at the Riverside Church in New York City. In it she described the United States as a global empire that reserves the right to bomb any of its subjects at any time, deriving its legitimacy directly from God. The speech was an indictment of the US actions relating to the Iraq War. In June 2005 she took part in the World Tribunal on Iraq. In March 2006, Roy criticised US President George W. Bush’s visit to India, calling him a “war criminal”.
In August 2006, Roy, along with Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn, and others, signed a letter in The Guardian called the 2006 Lebanon War a “war crime” and accused Israel of “state terror.” In 2007, Roy was one of more than 100 artists and writers who signed an open letter initiated by Queers Undermining Israeli Terrorism and the South West Asian, North African Bay Area Queers and calling on the San Francisco International LGBT Film Festival “to honor calls for an international boycott of Israeli political and cultural institutions, by discontinuing Israeli consulate sponsorship of the LGBT film festival and not cosponsoring events with the Israeli consulate.”
There are good grounds for honest fear at present. In the world-at-large, there is the danger of nuclear war due to miscalculation, if not by actual instigation by the London/Saudi/White House axis; there is suffering and strife; and the depravity of the U.S. elections. But the spirit of courage to overcome evil and danger, […]
Published on 9 Oct 2016 U S Caught Repainting Fighter Jets to RUSSIAN COLORS! False Flag Bombing Imminent! https://youtu.be/9uhvN76duwU
U.S. Caught Repainting Fighter Jets to RUSSIAN COLORS – False Flag Bombing Imminent!
- Post by Newsroom
- – Oct 09, 2016
The United States has been caught repainting several of their fighter jets in RUSSIAN Air Force Colors. Training? Or are they preparing to launch a horrific bombing inside Syria, then blaming it on the Russians as a precursor to US military action inside Syria?
Remember history: On April 15, 1961, a group of Cuban exiles took off from Nicaragua in a squadron of American B-26 bombers, painted to look like stolen Cuban planes, and conducted a strike against Cuban airfields. So we have known for decades that the US federal Government is full of snakes and vipers. Don’t put anything past these filth.
By repainting these fighter jets, they can send them out on bombing missions, make certain they fly low and slow around a target a few times so people on the ground whip out their cellphone cameras to video the attack, bomb the hell out of something and then sit back as all the civilian videos come out on social media showing a “Russian” plane committing the act! The perfect set up.
Now that we’re revealing this, look for someone to come out and claim it is for something like “training” but who needs to repaint planes for training? We have all sorts of electronics to Identify Friend-Foe (IFF). This enables us to fight at night, in bad weather . . . . zero visibility. So why repaint a plane for “training?”
Further, it isn’t only ONE plane the US is repainting; it’s quite a few! Take a look at one below:
The first three pics are of an U.S. F/A-18 fighter and attack aircraft in Russian coloring. The wingtips are raised for storage as this is a carrier enabled plane. The windows of the raised cockpit hood are covered with white sun protection sheets.)
On the bottom right is a picture of a real Russia SU-34 fighter jet in the usual Russian color scheme as it is also used by the Russian contingent in Syria.
It would be extremely difficult to distinguish these like-colored planes from each other in a shaky fly-by and “bombing” video.
It appears someone in the US is planning something nefarious. Don’t be duped into a war, America.
ELDER PATRIOT – The Bush wing of the old guard Republican elites still don’t understand what happened to them when Trump seized control of what they assumed was their party. They think that if they can get rid of Trump they will be able to regain their control over the Republican base. The people are truly delusional. That genie isn’t going back in their bottle.
Regardless, they’ve turned to relying on the same politics of personal destruction that they used to admonish the Democrats for doing when the Democrats found themselves losing in the arena of ideas.
Yesterday the Bush Republicans, in self-exile from the party they dominated for three decades, released an 11-year old video of Donald Trump talking to Billy Bush – yes one of those Bushes – about women in a wholly inappropriate manner.
The left is apoplectic over what they heard. That is only natural for a party faithful who needs a safe space at the mention of Harambe, Pepe the Frog, or the mere utterance of Donald Trump’s name, but for Republicans calling for Trump’s resignation it further exposes what…what…well, what pussies they really are.
Here’s a message to the Bushes, Mitt Romney, Mike Lee, Paul Ryan and the rest of these elitists, it ain’t your party any longer.
Trump’s supporters threw you sorry excuses for leaders out of power and they are not going to abandon the “everyman movement” that DJT leads simply because the language you find so offensive is part of their daily vernacular, and that includes his female supporters.
Trump conducted a hostile takeover of the Republican Party and the investors who backed him remain solidly behind him. And, they will remain that way because they are beyond caring about niceties in their candidates. Bill and Hillary Clinton saw to that.
They will continue to support Trump because he’s the only one from either party who speaks to the issues important to them. To his supporters, who have grown poorer and more disenfranchised by candidates using carefully crafted words, they view Mr. Trump as the tough sonofabitch they need to take on the elitist enemy. To his followers Trump has more in common with their union bosses who have never been known for their harmonious application of the language but who they could count on to win a back alley brawl.
Oh, there’s one more reason. Trump’s supporters aren’t so hypocritical as to claim they haven’t said such indelicate things on many occasions themselves. I’ve owned bars since Ronald Reagan was president and I’ve hosted more than a few bachelorette parties. Any woman who claims she finds objectification of the opposite sex disqualifying of someone else is either a liar, a hypocrite, or both.
Frankly, it’s about time we are led by a person who walks the walk and talks the talk like we do.