Was the 9-11 Attack the 2001 Version of “Operation Northwoods”?

Published on 8 Sep 2012

“The eyes see only what the mind is prepared to comprehend” [Robertson Davies]

9/11 revisited. [A must-see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fvJ8n…]

http://youtu.be/nX0e_AplhWw – 9/11 – The Impossible Case of Flight 175

http://youtu.be/T6zxJa-BbM4 9/11 – The Impossible Case of the Hijacker Pilots

http://youtu.be/pfecdtQXSPk – 9/11 – Is PNAC Creating the “Violent” New World Order? [includes a portion of the BBC documentary “Panorama – The War Party” on the Neoconservatives plan for America in their own words]

Recently when speaking about the Syrian government’s use of chemical weapons and his plans to attack Syria, President Obama stated: “When dictators commit atrocities, they depend upon the world to look the other way.”

After 9/11 much of the world has “looked the other way” as the United States attacked Iraq and the lies behind the attack have been brought to the forefront.

Could the 9-11 attack on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon have been the “New Pearl Harbor” mentioned in the neoconservative’s plan “Project For The New American Century?” A “New Pearl Harbor” was deemed necessary in order to expedite the plan. Was 9-11 a 21st century version of the 1962 False Flag plan “Operation Northwoods”?

“OPERATION NORTHWOODS”
U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba
N E W Y O R K, May 1, 2001

[ http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=926… ]

“In the early 1960s, America’s top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba.
Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities.
The plans were developed as ways to trick the American public and the international community into supporting a war to oust Cuba’s then new leader, communist Fidel Castro.
America’s top military brass even contemplated causing U.S. military casualties, writing: “We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba,” and, “casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation.”
The plans had the written approval of all of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and were presented to President Kennedy’s defense secretary, Robert McNamara, in March 1962. But they apparently were rejected by the civilian leadership…”

Neoconservatism has changed the Republican Party since the days of Eisenhower, and the teachings of political philosopher Leo Strauss has had a monumental influence on that change.

“Leo Strauss’ Philosophy of Deception: Many neoconservatives like Paul Wolfowitz are disciples of a philosopher who believed that the elite should use deception, religious fervor and perpetual war to control the ignorant masses.”
[ http://www.alternet.org/story/15935/l… ]

The following is an excerpt from the book review of “Leo Strauss and the American Right” by Shadia Drury, professor of philosophy at the University of Regina.
[ http://www.swans.com/library/art11/md… ]

“Strauss thinks that a political order can be stable only if it is united by an external threat, and following Machiavelli, he maintains that if no external threat exists, then one has to be manufactured.” The fundamental political categories are “us” and “them.” A sense of perpetual crisis and war cements the society together with absolute loyalty to the gentlemen. But the categories “us” and “them” do not stop at external enemies. The sense of crisis makes the struggle against internal enemies an even more desperate war of “us” against “them.”

“…Their job, at first, is to wean America away from its “love affair” with liberalism. To do this they will drive a wedge between liberalism and democracy….Democracy is the rule of the people, or rule according to the will of the people or the majority.” It can easily be used to suppress liberalism. By demagogic manipulation democracy, through a populist appeal, can be turned against liberalism.”

“The essential first task… is to produce ideology…to attack liberalism and gain power. Strauss’s hatred of liberalism is so virulent that he sees the struggle against it as a war, and in war all is fair. For this reason Straussians will use every dirty trick they can think of in the democratic arena in order to defeat liberalism. While doing so they will corrupt democracy itself. But since democracy is only a tool with which to defeat liberalism in order to institute the true Straussian hierarchical society, this is of little import. In the end they will jettison democracy if to do so is expedient.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUquZr… [9/11’s Massive Evidence – Why Some People Are Still In Denial]

Geef een reactie

Vul je gegevens in of klik op een icoon om in te loggen.

WordPress.com logo

Je reageert onder je WordPress.com account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Twitter-afbeelding

Je reageert onder je Twitter account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Facebook foto

Je reageert onder je Facebook account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Google+ photo

Je reageert onder je Google+ account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Verbinden met %s